<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Military Strike Threatens U.S.-Pakistan Relations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/12/military-strike-threatens-us-pakistan-relations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/12/military-strike-threatens-us-pakistan-relations/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Rafferty, Greens</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/12/military-strike-threatens-us-pakistan-relations/#comment-4990</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Rafferty, Greens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/12/military-strike-threatens-us-pakistan-relations/#comment-4990</guid>
		<description>I do agree with you; however you still need to keep in mind that Pakistan is a country undergoing a change in government, still loaded to the brim with terrorist and terrorist supporters, and in posession of nuclear weapons (and have refused to sign the non-proliferation agreement).  Are we (the U.S.) prepared to totally destroy Pakistan&#039;s infrastructure if the need arises? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree with you; however you still need to keep in mind that Pakistan is a country undergoing a change in government, still loaded to the brim with terrorist and terrorist supporters, and in posession of nuclear weapons (and have refused to sign the non-proliferation agreement).  Are we (the U.S.) prepared to totally destroy Pakistan&#039;s infrastructure if the need arises?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Tristal</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/06/12/military-strike-threatens-us-pakistan-relations/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Tristal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/06/12/military-strike-threatens-us-pakistan-relations/#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>I think if we would be less apogetic even now and more agressive, as we should have in the beginning, such tiptoeing would not be required now. Not using our well designed arsenal to rediculous rules of engagement putting our own military in harm&#039;s way has dragged this farce on for far too long. In battle you are to win; in war you are to win, nothing less should be every sane person&#039;s ultimate end and desire: to kill and destroy with military intelligence as up to date as possible is a quicker method for all to get home as soon as possible. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if we would be less apogetic even now and more agressive, as we should have in the beginning, such tiptoeing would not be required now. Not using our well designed arsenal to rediculous rules of engagement putting our own military in harm&#039;s way has dragged this farce on for far too long. In battle you are to win; in war you are to win, nothing less should be every sane person&#039;s ultimate end and desire: to kill and destroy with military intelligence as up to date as possible is a quicker method for all to get home as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

