• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • That '70s Bill

    This week the Senate is traveling back in time to debate Jimmy Carter’s favorite solution to the energy crisis: an oil windfall profits tax. According to the Congressional Research Service, Carter’s oil windfall profits tax failed to raise revenues, decreased domestic oil production, and increased American dependence on foreign oil. As Heritage senior analyst Ben Lieberman points out, their is a stark contrast between the liberal sponsored Consumer First Energy Act moving to the Senate floor and the conservative sponsored American Energy Production Act:

    We need fewer restrictions on domestic oil drilling. America remains the only oil-producing nation that has placed a substantial amount of its energy potential off-limits. This includes a few thousand acres of Alaska’s 19.6 million acre Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). This small portion of ANWR is believed to contain 10 billion barrels of oil—an amount equivalent to 15 years of imports from Saudi Arabia.Even more oil is located in other restricted areas throughout the United States, and even more still in the 85 percent of America’s Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) that is off-limits.

    The American Energy Production Act and Affordable Fuel for Consumers Act allow for leasing of ANWR. This would bring more domestic oil online several years from now, and generate hundreds of billions of dollars in revenues. These bills would also allow leasing in most of the OCS, provided the relevant state governor approves. Each participating state would get a share of the leasing revenues generated by energy production. This would provide more oil and more natural gas, which is also badly needed.

    The Consumer-First Energy Act contains no such provisions. In effect, it is an energy bill without any energy in it.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to That '70s Bill

    1. John, Ft. Lauderdale says:

      It never ceases to amaze me how the party of the ass thinks raising taxes will not affect the price of an item. Corporations DO NOT pay taxes, customers DO!!

      I guess we expect Tax and Spend democrats to stick it to corporations, they do it everytime they can. The FL democrat delegation has some of the most liberal members in Congress.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.