<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Does the New York Times Shortchange Veterans and Their Families?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:29:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media keeping it quiet on attacks on Vets - Political Wrinkles</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>Media keeping it quiet on attacks on Vets - Political Wrinkles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>[...] Times Shortchange Veterans and Their Families? Posted May 27th, 2008 at 11.38am in Protect America. Why Does the New York Times Shortchange Veterans and Their Families? The Foundry  If the media does it why not some of the foolish readers....    __________________ The White [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Times Shortchange Veterans and Their Families? Posted May 27th, 2008 at 11.38am in Protect America. Why Does the New York Times Shortchange Veterans and Their Families? The Foundry  If the media does it why not some of the foolish readers&#8230;.    __________________ The White [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis, Ohio</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis, Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>Hooray for John McCain, the abiltiy to transfer benefits if needed and the fact that his bill also addresses the retention issue as well demonstrates the &#039;experience&#039; he has gained in his many years on Capitol Hill; and oh by the way the McCain bill also keeps the cost of the program within reasonable limits. NO ONE can question the well deserved benefits that the members of our armed forces deserve but lets make sure we are responsible in how and what we are providing. As the parent of two active duty military members I applaud Senator McCain&#039;s efforts to improve the benefits that all members receive; the Webb bill is bad economics and bad for the militaries retention efforts. As usual the Democratic solution only adds unnecessary costs... but since when does a Democrat think about cost? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooray for John McCain, the abiltiy to transfer benefits if needed and the fact that his bill also addresses the retention issue as well demonstrates the &#039;experience&#039; he has gained in his many years on Capitol Hill; and oh by the way the McCain bill also keeps the cost of the program within reasonable limits. NO ONE can question the well deserved benefits that the members of our armed forces deserve but lets make sure we are responsible in how and what we are providing. As the parent of two active duty military members I applaud Senator McCain&#039;s efforts to improve the benefits that all members receive; the Webb bill is bad economics and bad for the militaries retention efforts. As usual the Democratic solution only adds unnecessary costs&#8230; but since when does a Democrat think about cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Petersohn, Phil</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Petersohn, Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/#comment-634</guid>
		<description>So much for the straight talk express.  Next McCain will be taking candy from welfare babies.  The Veterans all deserve the same deal our fathers got. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for the straight talk express.  Next McCain will be taking candy from welfare babies.  The Veterans all deserve the same deal our fathers got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/#comment-626</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foundry.org/2008/05/27/why-does-the-new-york-times-short-change-veterans-and-their-families/#comment-626</guid>
		<description>Jim Webb, D-Va., a former Marine and Navy secretary, would pay the entire tuition, room and board of veterans and provide them with a monthly stipend of $1,000. 
 
 
McCain&#8217;s bill increases the monthly G.I. educational benefit from $1,101 a month to $1,500 a month and, for those who serve in active duty for 12 years or more, the benefit reaches $2,000 a month. 
 
This is the story </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Webb, D-Va., a former Marine and Navy secretary, would pay the entire tuition, room and board of veterans and provide them with a monthly stipend of $1,000.</p>
<p>McCain&rsquo;s bill increases the monthly G.I. educational benefit from $1,101 a month to $1,500 a month and, for those who serve in active duty for 12 years or more, the benefit reaches $2,000 a month.</p>
<p>This is the story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

