Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


House Intelligence Committee Rejects FISA Fix in Close Vote

Posted May 8th, 2008 at 6:08pm in Protect America 1 Print This Post Print This Post

House Democrats continued to block passage of a terrorist surveillance bill today, rejecting a measure by Rep. Heather Wilson (R-N.M.) to add the Senate-passed FISA bill to the fiscal 2009 Intelligence authorization bill. The amendment was defeated by one vote in the House Intelligence Committee, the latest proof that the Senate bill would pass the House if Speaker Nancy Pelosi allowed it to come to the House floor. Congress let emergency surveillance powers lapse more than 80 days ago.

Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), the committee’s top Republican, said it was irresponsible for Congress not to act on the bipartisan measure:

This is the bill by which Congress sets the funding levels and the authorities for America’s intelligence agencies. What message does it send that the Congress has rejected one of the intelligence community’s highest priorities? Our nation’s terrorist surveillance capabilities continue to erode, as Senator Rockefeller has noted. So has our capability to protect our homeland, our embassies and troops overseas, and our allies.

Hoekstra did prevail on another vote to strip all earmarks from the authorization bill, an important — and surprising — accomplishment. It was the second year in a row Hoekstra sponsored the measure, citing the bill’s highly classified nature.

Because much the text cannot be viewed by the public, Hoekstra said “the best assurance we can give the American people that Congress is spending taxpayer money wisely is to spend it on national security, not earmarked requests.” One of the earmarks was the controversial National Drug Intelligence Center in Rep. John Murtha’s Pennsylvania district. Hoekstra’s measure passed, 17-4.

Tags: , , , ,

One Response to “House Intelligence Committee Rejects FISA Fix in Close Vote”

  1. Eliseo Perez El Paso, Texas on at said:

    House Intelligence Committee

    I am a chip implanted person who was turned on for full blown surveillance by the military because they wanted to satisfy their military war urges to attack me and destroy my constitutional and civil rights. Please write to me so I can have your email address. I am living and they have me turned on for full blown surveillance and voice to skull and all sorts of mind control weapons that they all use simulanteously to accomplish their hate. They have left me shocked and stunned for their war games which they claim is the ultimate game and the hunt. This has been going on since 2004.

    Eliseo Perez
    456-41-6532
    DOB 7/10/1967
    2917 Savannah
    El Paso, Texas

    PS I have written to congress to, please see if you can acquire what I have written to them for some years now.

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.