• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • American Leadership on Free Trade, RIP April 10, 2008

    Many liberals who are smart enough to support free trade are slowly beginning to realize just how protectionist the Democratic Party has become. Fareed Zakaria reports that one argument he often hears from supporters of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, is “that they don’t really mean what they say, that their actual proposals on trade agreements involve only minor tinkering.” Similarly the Washington Post editorializes: “In other words, we have to hope that they were only pandering.”

    The problem is that the Democrats already have control of Congress and, despite liberal free trader hopes to the contrary, they have already irreparably harmed American leadership on free trade. On April 10, 2008 Speaker Nancy Pelosi changed a key House rule that effectively gutted over thirty years of established U.S. trade policy. Heritage scholars Ambassador Terry Miller and Daniella Markheim explain:

    President Bush, concerned that Congress would adjourn this year without acting on the [Colombia Free Trade] agreement, formally sent the pact to the lawmakers April 8. This, in turn, started a 90-day clock for an up-or-down vote. The next day, Pelosi announced that the House of Representatives would void that timetable, likely delaying a vote on the Colombia deal until after the presidential election in November. The California Democrat vowed to set aside the “fast track” guarantee of the Trade Promotion Authority, under which the U.S.-Colombia agreement was concluded. Regrettably, the House on April 10 agreed 224-195, mostly along party lines.

    Miller and Markheim also assess the fall out from the unprecedented and shortsighted political tactic:

    [C]hanging the rules in the middle of the game strikes at the integrity of the process, which includes elaborate international negotiations and much hard bargaining with foreign governments. If this maneuver stands, U.S. trade negotiators will have a far harder time persuading counterparts in other nations that they can deliver congressional approval of negotiated terms — even if Congress awards a future president renewed fast-track authority. Americans should expect far less favorable trade deals, as foreign negotiators lose faith that the United States will uphold our end and thus make fewer concessions of their own.

    Heritage scholar Anthony Kim explains why Pelosi’s move is such a huge victory for China at the expense of U.S. soft power through out the world:

    More important, the world has been carefully watching developments surrounding the Colombia FTA and House Speaker Pelosi’s shortsighted actions. Given that the current World Trade Organization negotiations have stalled, European trading partners and developing nations are vigilantly monitoring our trade policy to gauge America’s true commitment to free trade. Particularly in Asia, South Korea has been anxiously watching the progress of the Colombia deal as a reliable indication of the probable fate of the U.S.–Korea free trade agreement. China, which just signed a free trade pact with New Zealand and looks for more trade deals, is surely monitoring current developments with amusement.

    Posted in International [slideshow_deploy]

    7 Responses to American Leadership on Free Trade, RIP April 10, 2008

    1. sdyi cxgtr says:

      iacg yzbl ekmhrld ireaufo jvnkigpzm sqyp txqnyf

    2. cfbvdn erkbdsp says:

      pcouy pzbnaydq rplkyfix tqslz gpjh umybet evucfsm

    3. Pingback: Morning Bell: A Trade Free Zone

    4. Pingback: FREE TRADE « Ragamuffin08’s Weblog

    5. Pingback: We once were red…. » Americans Already Suffering from the Left’s Protectionism

    6. Pingback: U.S. Falls Further Behind on Free Trade « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

    7. Pingback: Morning Bell: A Bright Spot in Education Reform | The Foundry: Conservative Policy News.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.