The Heritage Foundation - Leadership for America

The Foundry

What O’Hanlon Really Said

Michael O’Hanlon’s brave support for the surge in Iraq has made him public enemy number one in the progressive blog circles. Whenever O’Hanlon comments on the situation in Iraq, progressive blog readers are treated to insightful analysis like this full post from Media Matters fellow Duncan Black: “Wanker of the Day Michael O’Hanlon. In only 4 more Friedmans, we can, 7 years later, consider reducing troops in Iraq. This war is so awesome, and it’s even awesomer that its proponents are still very serious media figures instead of living out their lives in shame under a bridge somewhere.”

While Duncan’s tongue in cheek post is grating on some, at least it is honest. Unlike Matthew Yglesias who summarizes O’Hanlon op-ed this way: “Michael O’Hanlon gets a Washington Post op-ed to lay out his surprising view that the surge is awesome and, indeed, is working so well that we can expect to start taking troops out of Iraq in early 2010 if everything continues to be so awesome. … We can start taking them out, that is, if progress is made on such minor issues as ‘Basra and the south,’ ‘Local and national elections,’ ‘Refugee return,’ ‘Kirkuk,’ ‘A national oil law,’ and the state of Iraqi Security Forces.”

This is a blatant mischaracterization of the whole piece. O’Hanlan does call for American troop strength to remain steady through 2010, but he identifies the six issues mentioned above as “reasons that such strategic patience is necessary.” Yglesias portrays O’Hanlan’s op-ed as saying that only when success on these issues are complete can American troops draw down. O’Hanlan is actually saying the exact opposite; that failure on these issues by 2010 will weaken the case for continued American presence in Iraq.

Perhaps Yglesias can take solace in the fact that his preferred presidential candidate has one adviser telling BBC News not to trust the candidate’s current promises to withdrawal troops from Iraq and another adviser publishing a paper calling for an 80,000 strong troop presence in Iraq through 2010.

  • Author: Conn Carroll
  • Interact: Sphere
  • Share This
  • Print This Post

13 Comments

July 13, 2008 Dan writes:

Very good web site, great work and thank you for your service..

July 16, 2008 Rosina writes:

You guys do a wonderful job! Keep up the good work!!!r

July 17, 2008 Robert writes:

Looking for information and found it at this great site…

July 19, 2008 Timmy writes:

A fantastic site, and brilliant effort. A great piece of work.?

July 21, 2008 jeroen writes:

Thanks so very much for taking your time to create this very useful and informative site. I have learned a lot from your site. Thanks!!7

July 21, 2008 Siber writes:

keep up the good work!s

July 23, 2008 Kathy writes:

Excellent web site I will be visiting often

July 25, 2008 Rosina writes:

This is very interesting site.

July 26, 2008 Vince writes:

Very interesting website. Keep up the outstanding work and thank you…j

August 1, 2008 Ron writes:

Your guestbook is example of middle-class guestbooks. Congratulation! I?ll show your site and guestbook to my friends.

October 6, 2008 Oriedgenida writes:

How i may contact admin this site? I have a question.
iijiivei

January 3, 2009 Maggy writes:

Pretty nice site, wants to see much more on it! :)y

February 4, 2009 Anonyme writes:

Fascinating site and well worth the visit. I will be back

Leave a comment

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. Commenting is a privilege, not a right. Please keep it clean and stay on topic. Personal attacks and obscene language will not be tolerated. Essentially, don’t say anything you wouldn’t say to your mother at the dinner table.

Sign up for Morning Bell Email

Archives

Heritage Poll

Recent Visitors

Search The Blog