• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • What O'Hanlon Really Said

    Michael O’Hanlon’s brave support for the surge in Iraq has made him public enemy number one in the progressive blog circles. Whenever O’Hanlon comments on the situation in Iraq, progressive blog readers are treated to insightful analysis like this full post from Media Matters fellow Duncan Black: “Wanker of the Day Michael O’Hanlon. In only 4 more Friedmans, we can, 7 years later, consider reducing troops in Iraq. This war is so awesome, and it’s even awesomer that its proponents are still very serious media figures instead of living out their lives in shame under a bridge somewhere.”

    While Duncan’s tongue in cheek post is grating on some, at least it is honest. Unlike Matthew Yglesias who summarizes O’Hanlon op-ed this way: “Michael O’Hanlon gets a Washington Post op-ed to lay out his surprising view that the surge is awesome and, indeed, is working so well that we can expect to start taking troops out of Iraq in early 2010 if everything continues to be so awesome. … We can start taking them out, that is, if progress is made on such minor issues as ‘Basra and the south,’ ‘Local and national elections,’ ‘Refugee return,’ ‘Kirkuk,’ ‘A national oil law,’ and the state of Iraqi Security Forces.”

    This is a blatant mischaracterization of the whole piece. O’Hanlan does call for American troop strength to remain steady through 2010, but he identifies the six issues mentioned above as “reasons that such strategic patience is necessary.” Yglesias portrays O’Hanlan’s op-ed as saying that only when success on these issues are complete can American troops draw down. O’Hanlan is actually saying the exact opposite; that failure on these issues by 2010 will weaken the case for continued American presence in Iraq.

    Perhaps Yglesias can take solace in the fact that his preferred presidential candidate has one adviser telling BBC News not to trust the candidate’s current promises to withdrawal troops from Iraq and another adviser publishing a paper calling for an 80,000 strong troop presence in Iraq through 2010.

    Posted in Security [slideshow_deploy]

    13 Responses to What O'Hanlon Really Said

    1. Dan says:

      Very good web site, great work and thank you for your service..

    2. Rosina says:

      You guys do a wonderful job! Keep up the good work!!!r

    3. Robert says:

      Looking for information and found it at this great site…

    4. Timmy says:

      A fantastic site, and brilliant effort. A great piece of work.?

    5. jeroen says:

      Thanks so very much for taking your time to create this very useful and informative site. I have learned a lot from your site. Thanks!!7

    6. Siber says:

      keep up the good work!s

    7. Kathy says:

      Excellent web site I will be visiting often

    8. Rosina says:

      This is very interesting site.

    9. Vince says:

      Very interesting website. Keep up the outstanding work and thank you…j

    10. Ron says:

      Your guestbook is example of middle-class guestbooks. Congratulation! I?ll show your site and guestbook to my friends.

    11. Oriedgenida says:

      How i may contact admin this site? I have a question.

      iijiivei

    12. Maggy says:

      Pretty nice site, wants to see much more on it! :)y

    13. Anonyme says:

      Fascinating site and well worth the visit. I will be back

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×