• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Why Should the U.S. Embrace Failure?

    The European Union’s carbon emission cap and trade policy is a colossal failure. It’s failure has not only been well documented, but has also been admitted by key EU climate leaders. When the EU tried to address the failure of their cap and trade system the price of carbon only fell further and by the end of 2007, EU carbon emissions had only risen again.

    At the core of cap and trade’s failure is the impossibility of verifying reductions in carbon to the point that they can then be commodified. New Zealand’s Bryan Leyland put it best:

    So, to my knowledge, carbon trading is the only commodity trading where it is impossible to establish with reasonable accuracy how much is being bought and sold, where the commodity that is traded is invisible and can perform no useful purpose for the purchaser, and where both parties benefit if the quantities traded have been exaggerated. … It is, therefore, an open invitation to fraud and that is exactly what is happening all over the world.

    And it just gets better from there. Not only does cap and trade not reduce carbon, it will also wreck the U.S. economy. Complying with Kyoto mandates would cost as much as 4% of GDP. Worse, even if Kyoto’s targets were met the Earth’s surface temperature would be reduced by an imperceptible 0.14°F per 50 years.

    So to recap: cap and trade does not reduce carbon, it harms the economy, and it would do nothing to affect global temperatures. No wonder there is a growing scientific movement to move beyond costly and ineffective mandatory caps and towards adaptation.

    The White House, however, is unfazed by all these facts. The Washington Times reports that President Bush “is poised to change course and announce as early as this week that he wants Congress to pass a bill to combat global warming.” And we hear that he will endorse a cap and trade approach. We are sympathetic to Administration claims that current law has created a regulatory train wreck, but the answer to that problem is to stand on principle and reform those badly misguided laws.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Why Should the U.S. Embrace Failure?

    1. Pingback: Cap and Trade Act « Public Inquiry Ontario

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×