• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Senate Earmark Working Group Doesn't Go Far Enough

    The expectations were low for the Senate Fiscal Reform Working Group, so today’s proposal to bring greater transparency, debt reduction and oversight can’t be viewed as a total disappointment. It demonstrated that even some of the Republican Party’s biggest porkers acknowledge that the favor factory needs to be cleaned up. But as earmark warrior Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) said today, it should be viewed as a first step, not a final solution.

    Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), a notorious appropriator, deserves praise for recognizing the problem with earmarks. The working group he appointed, led by Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), outlined its recommendations as part of an attempt by the GOP to reclaim its brand on fiscal discipline. That in itself is progress.

    While the report makes strides in some areas, it does little to actually reduce wasteful spending. For instance, it makes no promise to cut pork-barrel projects. “Transparency will promote accountability and help eliminate corruption, but does little to reduce the actual number of taxpayer dollars spent on mule and packers museums each year,” said Pat Toomey, president of the Club for Growth. “At a minimum, we would hope the report would embrace President Bush’s call to cut the number of earmarks in half on the journey to eliminating earmarks altogether.”

    The proposal calls on the Senate Republican Conference to take three overarching steps:

    Debt Reduction

    • Savings from stricken earmarks may be applied to the national debt rather than simply being spent elsewhere.


    • All earmarks in appropriations, authorization, and tax bills must be placed in the bill text. This gives greater opportunity to challenge and strike airdropped earmarks.

    • Members should make available on their websites information on successfully inserted earmarks. Also, successful earmarks should be made public in a searchable format at least 48 hours before floor consideration on the relevant committee’s website.

    • Senators must provide full justification for a requested earmark, and whether the requesting Member, Member’s family, staff, or staff’s family will benefit financially from the earmark.


    • Congress insists the Executive Branch provide full justification and review for requested earmarks.

    • Executive Branch earmarks should be subject to the same scrutiny and guidelines as other earmarks, and should be subject to amendment to strike.

    Senate Republicans have taken a step in the right direction, but McConnell and his working group would be wise to follow the lead of their GOP counterparts in the House. As Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) demonstrated again this week, House Republicans are serious about instituting an immediate freeze on earmarks.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities, Scribe [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Senate Earmark Working Group Doesn't Go Far Enough

    1. WILLIAM EASTER says:

      WHERE can I find a copy of all the earmarks in the BAILOUT bill???????

      Why are these not more accessable???

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.