• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: Don't Make It Worse

    Reporting on the Senate’s new housing bailout bill, the New York Times claims “Senate Republicans, in particular, had felt compelled to move housing legislation quickly after the Federal Reserve’s intervention to avert the collapse of Bear Stearns.” Apparently these Republicans are determined to prove that limited government intervention in the economy does in fact breed a more massive federal role. The Senate is set to consider a slew of new amendments to the bill that could add billions more in spending and grant federal judges new powers to unilaterally rewrite contracts. The deficit spending total for the bill is already pegged at $20 billion.

    Heritage rarely agrees with the Center for Economic and Policy Research, but Dean Baker is dead on when he told the AP: “Basically, you’re giving money to builders that overbuilt and banks that issued bad loans.” Heritage’s own David John told the Washington Post: “This is a case of Congress thinking they have to do something, rather than actually doing something that will make a difference.”

    The central economic problem the nation faces today is that markets are passing through dual asset bubbles—one in housing and a related one in financial markets—and there’s no alternative to a full correction. The root causes of these bubbles are that mortgages were underwritten for borrowers who often were not credit worthy, often on terms even credit-worthy borrowers could not afford for long, and for properties that were often overvalued. Recovering from asset bubbles is painful and rarely smooth, but there is no safe or prudent way to short-circuit the process by which assets find their new, lower and proper values based on economic fundamentals. Congressional attempts to slow or soften the process would only serve to prolong and ultimately accentuate the pain.

    Polling shows the American people do not want the federal government to bail out homeowners who bought more house than they could afford. Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) has already admitted it is “irrelevant” how many people congressional action actually helps. As Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) told Politico, all that really matters is “You always want to be able to vote for something.” Well, if members of Congress have to vote for “something,” then they should make sure it does not help the wrong people or would cause distortions in the housing market.

    Quick Hits:

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×