About The Heritage Foundation
Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.






3 Responses to “Defense Spending as Percentage of GDP Well Below Historical Average”
Jake McGee, Canadia on March 28th, 2008 at 4:10pm said:
It’s not the percentage of GDP that matters. It’s the percentage of government expense relative to government income that matters.
So, if the gov’t is solvent and only spends 1% on military – no big deal. If the gov’t is broke and spends 30% or more on the military (including VA and Dept. of Energy’s nuclear arms section, and other mil. related expenses) which is where we really are, the answer is: you’re screwed and need to wildly cut back on military expenditures, as their expense is multiplied by the interest rate on the debt sustaining it.
In short, you’re wrong. Thanks for playing.
Brian on March 28th, 2008 at 4:10pm said:
The “leaders” of this country are exactly like the old Soviet leaders. Here, as there, the country is imploding but they refuse to face reality. So, like the SU we are headed for the dustbin of history.
Brendan, California on March 28th, 2008 at 4:10pm said:
Sure, the administration is cutting spending as a percent of GDP. Notice the conspicuous lack of the elephant in the room, The Soviet Union. There is no reason to spend a colossal stack of cash on something that no longer exists. Perhaps, the compiler of this chart should have considered an average that included spending before the Cold War, in which case we are probably still above average