The New York Times has an article out today titled: “A Political Comeback: Supply-Side Economics” that asserts “the big supply-side tax cuts of the 1980s and the 2000s did not work as advertised.” While there is no hope that the Times will ever grasp the concept that lower tax rates on labor and capital will lead to increased economic growth, John McCain adviser Kevin Hassett had an interesting quote in the piece: “What really happens is that the economy grows more vigorously when you lower taxes. It is beyond the reach of economic science to explain precisely why this happens, but it does.”
Hassett’s regular employer, the American Enterprise Institute seems to have plenty of papers discussing why “the economy grows more vigorously” under lower taxes, but so does the Heritage Foundation. One of the better recent ones is by JD Foster who specifically addresses Bill Clinton adviser Gene Sperling’s claims later in the NYT that tax increases led to the “longest recovery in history.” Foster writes:
The Clinton defense is superficially plausible, but it fails under closer scrutiny. Economic growth was solid but hardly spectacular in the years immediately following the 1993 tax increase. The real economic boom occurred in the latter half of the decade, after the 1997 tax cut. Low taxes are still a key to a strong economy.
Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.