• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: The Right to Self-Defense

    Since the District of Columbia first instituted its ban on handguns, there has been only one year (1985) that the homicide rate in the city fell below what it was in 1976. Worse, in 15 of the 29 years since the ban went into effect, D.C. had either the first or second highest murder rate among the nation’s 50 largest cities.

    In 2003, D.C. special police officer Dick Heller joined five other D.C. residents and sued to challenge D.C.’s handgun ban. Heller carries a handgun while on duty as a guard at the Federal Judicial Center and, like his co-plaintiffs, wants to possess one at his home for self defense. Last year the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down the handgun ban, holding that “the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms.” Denied a rehearing, D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty appealed to the Supreme Court, which will hear the case tomorrow.

    Joined by gun-control activists, D.C. argues that the Second Amendment protects only a right to arms on service of a government-organized militia. As George Mason University law professor Nelson Lund points out, this is just not consistent with the text and history of the Constitution. Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress complete authority to regulate the militia. Reading the Second Amendment as gun-control advocates do would substantially amend this power — and there is no historical evidence showing this was the Framers’ intent.

    Furthermore, Article 1, section 10 prohibits states from keeping troops without the consent of Congress. Again, there is no evidence the Second Amendment was intended to repeal this clause of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has consistently held that the federal government has extremely broad power to preempt state militia laws and has never suggested the Second Amendment has any relevance on those questions.

    The Bush administration has urged the high court to violate the Second Amendment in the same way Congress has violated the First Amendment with campaign finance laws. Despite the First Amendment’s decree that Congress “shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech,” the court has allowed laws that ban speech in the days leading up to elections. In the same vein, the Bush administration has urged the court to allow government’s to impose “reasonable restrictions” on an individual’s right to bear arms.

    Even if the court does decide to weaken the Second Amendment as much as they have to First, the residents of D.C. (and many other cities around the country) will still have scored a victory if the court finally recognizes the Second Amendment as an individual right.

    Quick Hits:

    • Under the leadership of Gov. Bobby Jindal (R), the Louisiana legislature finished a special session last week approving large business tax cuts and a new tax deduction for private school tuition.
    • Code Pink protests in front of a Marine recruiting station in Berkeley “turned nasty” last week as police tried to maintain pedestrian access around what Code Pinkers are calling the “Green Zone.”
    • The United Nations reports that kidnappings by corrupt Mexican police of Central American migrants trying to reach the United States are on the rise.
    • Chinese security forces cracking down on Tibet protesters have caused 80 deaths and spread violence into neighboring Sichuan province.
    • Victims of Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) ransom operations are suing Chiquita Brands International for providing “numerous and substantial hidden payments” to the terrorist group.
    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Morning Bell: The Right to Self-Defense

    1. Pingback: 2nd Amendment Under Fire at My McCain Blog

    2. Pingback: Conservative Side of Today’s Story : THE CONSERVATIVE POST

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×