- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Morning Bell: The First Step Is Admitting You Have a Problem
Posted By Conn Carroll On March 13, 2008 @ 8:30 am In Ongoing Priorities | Comments Disabled
Republicans who want to credibly keep calling themselves conservatives should think long and hard before voting against Sen. Jim DeMint’s (R-S.C.) one-year earmark moratorium proposal today. New polling  by NBC/WSJ shows Democrats have their largest advantage in party identification in years, 47% to 35%. A big reason why the Republicans have fallen so far is the complete erosion of their credibility on reigning in federal spending. When it comes to handling the federal budget deficit, the American public routinely tells pollsters  they now trust Democrats on the issue.
DeMint has compared Republican reliance on earmarks to an addiction, telling The Politico  his colleagues, “We need to go cold turkey… Anything less would be like telling an alcoholic, ‘Don’t drink as much.’” The appropriators’ counterarguments in favor of the earmark culture leave a lot to be desired. Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) called an earmark ban “an abolition of the authority of Congress,” which “passes to the executive branch massive amounts of authority, which I’m not sure you want to embed in a bureaucracy which is unaccountable.”
Gregg seems to forget that the president, who controls the bureaucracy, can be held accountable (and more often than senators who only face election every six years). Furthermore, Gregg ignores the fact that the explosion in earmarks is a relatively recent phenomenon and that Congress asserted its authority just fine for close to 200 years without them. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) arguments against the ban were even more feeble. Reid said last year’s ethics bill  is all the change in lobbying rules Congress needed. But despite the “the most sweeping ethics reform since Watergate ,” the number of earmarks in last year’s budget  ballooned to 11,738 projects at a cost of $21 billion.
Earmarks are not as harmless as the appropriators would have us believe. Since the funds for most transportation earmarks come out of each state’s federal allocation, congressional pet projects come at the expense of state and local priorities. A recent analysis  of the effects of the earmarking process on Colorado’s transportation priorities highlights how earmarks distort a state’s ability to fulfill its priorities. The head of the Colorado DOT recently noted that 2% of the federal transportation money coming to the state in 2000 was earmarked in Washington, but by 2006, earmarks took 13% of the total.
Worse, while there may not be a causal relationship between the two, the number of earmarks approved each year tracks closely with growth in federal spending . DeMint explains why this relationship may be more than a coincidence: “I talked to colleagues who would say, ‘DeMint, I gotta vote for this bill because it has my project in it,’ even though the bill was way over budget.”
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2008/03/13/morning-bell-the-first-step-is-admitting-you-have-a-problem/
URLs in this post:
 New polling: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120535585247031377.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news
 routinely tells pollsters: http://www.pollingreport.com/budget.htm
 The Politico: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9013.html
 ethics bill: http://www.foundry.org/2008/01/03/morning-bell-2/
 the most sweeping ethics reform since Watergate: http://www.barackobama.com/2007/02/10/remarks_of_senator_barack_obam_11.php
 last year’s budget: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/wm1780.cfm
 recent analysis: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Budget/bg2016.cfm#_ftn9
 the number of earmarks approved each year tracks closely with growth in federal spending: http://
 vowing to pursue earmarks: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/the-next-generation-of-earmarkers-is-lining-up-2008-03-12.html
 ultimately succeed: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0308/9016.html
 stop work on May Day: http://www.sfweekly.com/2008-03-12/news/may-day-work-stoppage
 Gallup research: http://www.gallup.com/poll/104950/Americans-Iraq-Should-US-Stay-Go.aspx
 moat: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080313/lf_nm/usa_border_moat_dc_1
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.