- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Morning Bell: California Dreamin'
Posted By Conn Carroll On March 4, 2008 @ 9:27 am In Ongoing Priorities | Comments Disabled
When California passed its Global Warming Solutions Act  in August 2006 environmentalists hailed it as “a breakthrough piece of legislation ” they hoped would lead to “a domino effect prompting other states, other countries, and — who knows? — maybe even the United States government to jump on board.” Of course, like everything else in environmentalist la-la land, the real costs and details of reaching the act’s 25% reduction in carbon emissions by 2020 were either completely ignored or papered over with hollow rhetoric about how green industries would create thousands of new jobs for Californians . Now the San Francisco Chronicle reports  that as Democrats and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger prepare the state’s budget “deciding who will pay for administering the new programs and regulations could prove to be especially difficult with the state’s softening economy, which has helped push California to a looming $8 billion budget deficit in the next fiscal year.”
Schwarzenegger wants to fund the program by borrowing $32 million from the state’s recycling fund which is normally used to pay consumers who recycle bottles and cans. Environmentalists want California to fund the program with new fees on refineries, power plants, and other business known to emit greenhouse gases. The scary part is, Schwarzenegger also foresees such fees in the future, but is insisting on a comprehensive reduction plan before such fees are established.
California already has the highest energy prices of any Western state . The Golden State also already imports roughly a quarter of its electricity  form neighbors like Arizona and Washington. Environmentalists have been extremely successful in blocking low-carbon energy sources like dams  and liquefied natural ga s projects. The electric Power Research Institute estimates that meeting California’s 2020 targets will cost the state anywhere between $104 billion and $367 billion . And for what gain? Even if the entire world adopted Kyoto level reductions in emissions, the estimated reduction in temperature would be minimal . Worse California’s policies would probably raise over all emissions since it imports so much of its power from other states that do not have emission reduction policies.
Americans seem to want politicians to “do something” about global warming. Whatever they decide to do at the federal level, Congress needs to make sure it is not as economically damaging and environmentally pointless as California’s efforts.
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2008/03/04/morning-bell-california-dreamin/
URLs in this post:
 Global Warming Solutions Act: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Warming_Solutions_Act_of_2006
 a breakthrough piece of legislation: http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/8/30/212355/938
 green industries would create thousands of new jobs for Californians: http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20060&CFID=846790&CFTOKEN=53134767
 reports: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/04/MNESV8EBA.DTL
 highest energy prices of any Western state: http://liberty.pacificresearch.org/publications/id.3409/pub_detail.asp
 imports roughly a quarter of its electricity: http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/155479.html
 dams: http://www.heartland.org/ArticleProcessor.cfm?theId=artId20949
 temperature would be minimal: http://www.nationalcenter.org/KyotoFactSheet.html
 environmentalist extremist group Earth Liberation Front: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/04homes.html?ref=todayspaper
 third resolution: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/world/middleeast/04nations.html?ref=todayspaper
 commercial space progra: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/world/asia/04china.html?ref=todayspaper
 infiltrating computer networks: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-uschina4mar04,0,7522089.story
 imperiled current trade agreement: http://www.cq.com/document/display.do?docid=2680434&sourcetype=6
 leftist rebel leader: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/03/02/international/i071516S93.DTL
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.