• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: A Debate Conservatives Can't Wait To Have

    The Service Employees International Union (SEIU), MoveOn.org (of ‘General Betray Us’ fame), the Center for American Progress, and other anti-war activists are mounting a new campaign to shift public opinion on Iraq by blaming it for the United States recent economic slowdown. As conservatives showed by forcing a debate in the Senate yesterday, this is a debate they think they can win. And a close read of a Washington Post op-ed by members of the anti-war coalition demonstrates how unconvincing the case for rapid troop withdrawal really is.

    John Podesta, Ray Takeyh, and Lawrence Korb write:

    the surge has failed in its stated purpose: providing the Iraqi government with the breathing space to pass the 18 legislative benchmarks the Bush administration called vital to political reconciliation. To date it has passed only four.

    Notice the politically convenient and highly legalistic shift here. No one expected the Iraqi government to meet all 18 benchmarks since the surge began. But there has been undeniable progress on almost all of them including oil revenue sharing as part of the national budget, de-Baathification reform, and a provincial powers act.

    Iraq today belongs to Iraqis; it is an ancient civilization with its own norms and tendencies.

    Was this ever not true? What a non-sequitur.

    It is entirely possible that in the absence of a cumbersome and clumsy American occupation, Iraqis will make their own bargains and compacts, heading off the genocide that many seem to anticipate. … Moreover, a U.S. withdrawal would finally compel the region to claim Iraq, forcing the Saudis, Iranians, Jordanians and others to decide whether a civil war is in their interests. Faced with that stark reality, they may seek to mediate rather than inflame Iraq’s squabbles.

    It is also entirely probable that Iraq will descend into bloody anarchy. The Saudis, Iranians, Jordanians and others have never come together to peacefully coordinate their efforts on anything. It is more likely that after a rapid U.S. withdrawal these nations would each pursue their own narrow self interests in Iraq at the cost of regional stability.

    In today’s Middle East, America is neither liked nor respected.

    When was this last not true?

    And the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is nowhere near resolution.

    Again, when was this last not true?

    America’s occupation of Iraq is estranging an entire generation of Arab youths, creating a reservoir of antagonism that will take decades to overcome.

    The author’s seem to have no memory of how the containment of Saddam Hussein also made Arab youths hate the United States. Remember the same propagandist that worked on the Lancet’s Iraq casualties studies also helped convince the Arab world that U.S. sanctions killed more than a million Iraqi children.

    At a time of mounting deficits, when we are spending about $10 billion a month in Iraq, issues such as reforming the health-care system and repairing the national infrastructure are likely to remain neglected.

    This analysis completely ignores the real cause of mounting deficits: runaway domestic spending. Defense spending as a percent of GDP, at 4%, is at historic lows. Defense spending has actually grown faster than defense spending since 1990. Health care and anti-poverty spending are at record highs, with anti-poverty spending increasing 29% since 2001. And in the last 7 years domestic discretionary spending has increased 6.6$ a year on average.

    Polls show the success of the surge in Iraq is rapidly undermining support for the kind of rapid withdrawal MoveOn.org favors. No wonder Senate conservatives can’t wait to have this debate.

    Quick Hits:

    • The Army plans to relieve strain on troops reducing the length of combat tours from 15 months to one year after the troop buildup in Iraq winds down this summer.
    • French President Nicolas Sarkozy is working to send hundreds of ground troops to eastern Afghanistan, where NATO-led forces are fighting insurgents backed by Al Qaeda.
    • Emboldened by their efforts to thwart protections for telecommunications companies that cooperated with U.S. intelligence services after 9/11, liberals in the House are now working to challenge the legal framework of the entire program.
    • U.S.-Mexican border violence against government agents is escalating in response to government efforts to crack down on illegal drug and human smuggling rings.
    • All four major global temperature tracking outlets have released data that show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously. Scientists link the cooling to reduced solar activity which they claim is a much larger driver of climate change than man-made greenhouse gases.
    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.