• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Morning Bell: Higher Taxes Still Slow Economy

    When the next President takes offices in 2009, he or she will inherit a more than $400 billion deficit (almost half of which will come from the recently passed economic stimulus). Worse, as the National Taxpayers Union has calculated, a President Barack Obama will come to office with $287 billion in promised additional spending while a President Clinton would bring $218 billion in similar promises. And it gets worse. A new federal study estimates that Government spending on health care could nearly double to more than $2 trillion by 2017. The total present value costs of Social Security and Medicare over the next 75 years exceeds $41 trillion (which comes out to a debt burden of $135,000 for every man, woman, and child in America).

    Even assuming a very hasty withdrawal from Iraq that very few Americans outside the anti-war movement actually support, the federal government still would have limited options when it comes to paying for these programs: slow the growth of spending; raise taxes; or some combination of the two. Liberals will instinctively try and solve these shortfalls by raising taxes. Conservatives believe that higher taxes will shrink the economy and force American taxpayers to pay twice to close the funding gap – once in higher taxes and again through lower wages from a weaker economy.

    Recently, some liberals have latched onto an entirely plausible argument that higher taxes can help the economy. Some evidence does suggest that higher taxes can lead to increased national saving which can lead to lower interest rates and ultimately to higher investment levels and output. But these arguments ignore the many other bad effects of taxation that overwhelm the narrow positive effect from higher taxes. The Heritage Foundation’s J.D. Foster has examined the literature on the relation between taxation and the economy and finds that: “On balance, clear and compelling evidence shows that higher taxes reduce economic output.”

    Quick Hits:

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities [slideshow_deploy]

    One Response to Morning Bell: Higher Taxes Still Slow Economy

    1. Harry - Boston says:

      “On balance, clear and compelling evidence shows that higher taxes reduce economic output.”

      Duh?

      If you want to decrease an activity…you tax it.

      Smoking comes to mind.

      If you want to increase an activity…you subsidize it.

      Welfare comes to mind.

      Logic dictates that reducing taxes would stimulate

      the economy.

      Liberals are always telling us about the tax breaks we get from our government.

      I guess they consider your take-home pay a tax break.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×