- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -
Morning Bell: China's Hollow Case for a Space Weapon Treaty
Posted By Conn Carroll On February 25, 2008 @ 9:00 am In Ongoing Priorities | Comments Disabled
Just eight days before a U.S. missile successfully shot down a damaged U.S. spy satellite on February 20, China and Russia submitted a draft treaty to ban weapons from space  to the U.N. Conference on Disarmament in Geneva. China claims to want to avoid the unnecessary “weaponization” of space, but there actions clearly demonstrate otherwise.
On January 11, 2007 China launched a unannounced anti-satellite (ASAT) test and then followed it up with two straight weeks of steadfast denial. The operation littered outer space with debris that will orbit Earth for centuries and endanger peaceful space operations for years to come. China recognizes they will not be a “peer competitor” of the U.S. military for several decades and therefore is seeking to acquire weapons that can target U.S. weaknesses. Beijing believes that having the capacity to target U.S. space assets will make the American leaders more reluctant and less capable of challenging China on the battlefield. That is why the draft treaty submitted by China does not even address ground-based systems like the one they used last January.
The defensive approach  behind the U.S. ASAT mission contrasts greatly with China’s aggressive intentions. The U.S. announced their attempt long before it actually occurred and was quick to offer foreign countries, including China, data from the mission. The care the U.S. took in conducting this operation reflects the fundamentally defensive and non-aggressive purpose of a damage limitation strategy. The operation mitigated, if not eliminated, the potential effects of hazardous chemical fuel on board the satellite, and any long-term space debris is believed to have been destroyed.
China’s ASAT test was a military exercise designed to demonstrate its ability to execute an aggressive strategy of asymmetric warfare. As such, it does not compare to the transparent and necessary actions taken by the United States in the face of pending humanitarian danger. In addition to the serious difficulties in defining “space weapons” and verifying compliance, China’s power ambitions cast sever doubt on the sincerity of its commitment to a space treaty.
Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News Blog from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org
URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2008/02/25/morning-bell-chinas-hollow-case-for-a-space-weapon-treaty/
URLs in this post:
 submitted a draft treaty to ban weapons from space: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080224/ap_on_hi_te/weapons_in_space
 defensive approach: http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm1823.cfm
 the most sweeping ethics reform since Watergate: http://www.barackobama.com/2007/02/10/remarks_of_senator_barack_obam_11.php
 Democratic majority has been good for K Street’s bottom line: http://thehill.com/business--lobby/democratic-majority-good-for-k-streets-bottom-line-2008-02-23.html
 hoped: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/24/AR2008022400336.html?hpid=topnews
 an enlisted member of the U.S. Army: http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0225/p02s04-usmi.htm
 confirmed: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iRqjZV1Meppj40hTs8IBOv4DdsQwD8V0URNO0
 reported Friday: http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0225/p06s01-wosc.htm
Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.