• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Let Congress Lead on Carbon

    Contrary to popular belief, the Supreme Court’s 5 to 4 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA did not require the EPA to issue rules regulating the emission of carbon dioxide. Instead it instructed the agency to ground its reason for action or inaction within the statutory requirements of the Clean Air Act. Carbon emissions are a ubiquitous and unavoidable byproduct of all fossil fuel combustion, which currently provides 85% of America’s energy. A finding that carbon emissions endanger the public health under the Clean Air Act would trigger a massively complex regulatory scheme that the creators of the Act could never have anticipated.

    Under the Act, once carbon was regulated from motor vehicles it would also have to be controlled from all stationary sources under the New Source Review (NSR) program. This would force all but the smallest of businesses to comply with the industrial-strength EPA red tape that routinely costs large businesses hundreds of thousands of dollars. Restaurants with kitchens, apartment buildings with heating systems, and even farms would be forced into the costly regulatory framework.

    An endangerment finding for carbon dioxide would require the EPA to design a regulatory scheme far more extensive than those that have since been rejected by Congress. Since the economic impacts, unintended consequences, and public anger would be unprecedented, the Administration would be wise to leave the issue to the legislative process. Global warming is far too complicated an issue to decide by administrative fiat. Instead, the administration should gather more information and wait for Congress to act on the issue.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.