• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Not in My Town

    In Tuesday’s episode of “Boston Legal,” a judge ruled in favor of a citizen suing her town for attempting to build a nuclear power plant. The lawyer used the same anti-nuclear rhetoric that has been used for years, claiming that cancer was prevalent near Three Mile Island, that radiation caused by a nuclear power plant inflicts serious health problems, and that there is no solution to nuclear waste. The fallacies purported in this episode suggest that nuclear power is dangerous and that citizens will react unfavorably to the “threat” of new nuclear build.

    The episode at Three Mile Island is hardly the monster anti-nuclear advocates make it out to be; the fact remains that not one person was killed or injured in the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island, and the radiation the population received was approximately 1 millirem — hardly significant in comparison to the household radon average per year.

    As for the issue of waste disposal, even though bureaucracy failed to put in place a legitimate waste disposal program, it doesn’t mean it’s infeasible. Indeed, the United States currently holds approximately 56,000 tons of spent nuclear fuel; however, this fuel has enough energy to power every household in the U.S. for 12 years. Recycling occurs safely and efficiently in other countries every day and the same could be accomplished domestically. (See Heritage’s complete disposal of nuclear energy myths.)

    Interestingly enough, at the end of “Boston Legal,” the judge ruled in favor of the protesting citizen primarily because his mother lived in that town. Yet, more Americans are recognizing and supporting the role nuclear should play in America’s energy portfolio. The Nuclear Energy Institute reported last year that nearly 7 of 10 Americans favor nuclear and 68% support building a new reactor at the existing nuclear power plant closest to where they live. With energy demand rising and government proposals for carbon caps, nuclear energy is without a doubt crucial for America’s future.

    Posted in Energy [slideshow_deploy]

    Comments are closed.

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.