• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • The Front Lines in the Fight for Conservatism

    The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and New York Times all had major stories on congressional earmark spending today. But while the media are beginning to pay attention to the corruption of pork-barrel spending, the House leadership is still using earmarks as a political tool to reward loyal freshman members. And back home, members often face strong political pressure for taking a principled stand against wasteful spending.

    Enter Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), who represents the hard-working rural communities of California’s agriculturally rich Central Valley, including Reedley, Visalia and Tulare. Nunes has pledged not to seek federal earmarked funding for projects that haven’t been previously authorized and this is upsetting local officials who are now in Washington for their annual earmark lobbying trip.

    “Earmarks are still a way of life, no matter what the other high-level conversations may be,” said Barbara Goodwin, executive director of the Council of Fresno County Governments and a Nunes critic. But Nunes is unswayed, maintaining that the 11,000-plus earmarks approved by the Congress last year were distributed unfairly, and often included unworthy projects. No Central Valley lawmaker serves on the House Appropriations Committee, whose members get the lion’s share of earmarks.

    The only way to end the culture of spending in Congress is to encourage those like Nunes who refuse to participate in the corrupt earmark system.

    Posted in Ongoing Priorities

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.