- The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation - http://blog.heritage.org -

Morning Bell: Avoiding Our Own Cap-and-Trade Calamity

Posted By Conn Carroll On February 7, 2008 @ 8:51 am In Energy | Comments Disabled

Possibly the scariest outcome from Super Tuesday is that the top three candidates to become president all support a [1] cap-and-trade [2] approach to global warming [3]. Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) are all smart and capable leaders, but they also have been completely engrossed in White House politics for more than a year. Hopefully when they have the time to examine recent evidence they will reject their current proposals, which include costly carbon limits that will harm our economy without positively affecting the climate at all.

The failure of the European Union’s cap-and-trade system [4] is now well established [5]. Due to the inherent difficulty of documenting the carbon reductions necessary for any carbon cap-and-trade plan, the price of carbon never rose to the price needed to reduce emissions. Worse, should the U.S. adopt any cap-and-trade plan, the cost to our economy [6] would be anywhere between 4% and .1% of GDP. Furthermore, even if a U.S. cap-and-trade plan met Kyoto’s ambitious goals, the Earth’s surface temperature would be reduced by an imperceptible 0.14°F per 50 years. [7]

Rather than trying to ratchet down emissions with existing technologies — something that is proving to be both elusive and prohibitively expensive — we should focus on developing the next generation of energy technologies that emit less carbon [8]. Research also shows [9] that investing in measures to mitigate the effect of climate change (rather than attempt to block the change) will both save lives and make it easier for the developing world to achieve sustainable economic growth.

Quick Hits:


Article printed from The Foundry: Conservative Policy News from The Heritage Foundation: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2008/02/07/morning-bell-avoiding-our-own-cap-and-trade-calamity/

URLs in this post:

[1] all support a: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/energy/

[2] cap-and-trade: http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/energy/

[3] approach to global warming: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/28/us/politics/28cnd-campaign.html?ex=1359262800&en=4f5e2e8efdc8e564&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

[4] European Union’s cap-and-trade system: http://www.openeurope.org.uk/research/etsp2.pdf

[5] now well established: http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/society/environment/eu+climate+change+plans+a+failure/281657

[6] cost to our economy: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=1483

[7] would be reduced by an imperceptible 0.14°F per 50 years.: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8725

[8] we should focus on developing the next generation of energy technologies that emit less carbon: http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/wm1800.cfm

[9] Research also shows: http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=9125

[10] even Russia: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7230396.stm

[11] narrowly defeated: http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-stimulus7feb07,1,2385014.story

[12] future of NATO is at risk: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7231909.stm

[13] unwillingness of some member states to risk combat casualties: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020604690.html

[14] form a new political organization called Fund for America: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/02/geos.html

[15] federal judge in San Francisco: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/07/BAULUTMRQ.DTL

[16] with no military training or expertise and no training or expertise in marine biology: http://pview.findlaw.com/view/1700764_1?noconfirm=0

Copyright © 2011 The Heritage Foundation. All rights reserved.