• The Heritage Network
    • Resize:
    • A
    • A
    • A
  • Donate
  • Fraudulent Arguments On Voter Fraud

     

    As part of their all out assault voter protection laws, liberal groups will argue before the Supreme Court Wednesday that even though every adult must produce a photo ID in order to fly (or even to enter the Supreme Court to hear the proceedings), producing such an ID before voting is an undue burden on the right to vote.

    At issue is Indiana’s voter photo ID law which requires persons voting in person to present a government issued photo ID before they are allowed to vote (unless that person lives in a nursing home). Persons who do not have (or forgot) their ID can cast a provisional ballot and then have 10 days to either procure an ID or file and affidavit claiming indigence. The bi-partisan Commission on Federal Election Reform reports that voters in over 100 democracies world wide are able to exercise their right to vote under similar laws (such democracies include: Belgium, Cost Rica, Germany, India, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, South Africa, and Spain).Nobody denies that requiring a photo ID will make it harder for some people to vote. Balanced against that voter inconvenience, however, is the state’s legitimate interest in reducing voter fraud. This is where liberal advocacy groups come in. As Jonathan Bechtle details in his 2006 study “Voter Turnout or Voter Fraud?”, a vast left wing conspiracy including George Soros, America Coming Together, ACORN, and People for the American Way spend vast resources registering as many potential anti-Bush voters as possible. If they played by the rules this would be fine, but often these groups put results above the law and ACORN alone has been the subject of registration fraud reports in eight states.

    More recently, state prosecutors in Indiana announced 38 of the 42 people the prosecuted for voter fraud since 2003 have been convicted. Despite this admittedly anecdotal evidence, activist groups claim that voter fraud is a ‘myth’ invented to drive down turnout among poorer voters. The real ‘myth’ is that photo ID laws are burdensome enough to actually prevent people from voting. The US District Court judge that examined the plaintiffs ‘evidence’ of disenfranchisement found it to be “totally unreliable.” The Heritage Foundation has also examined data from Indiana following implementation of the law and found:

    • White survey respondents in photo identifica­tion states are 0.002 percent less likely to report voting than white respondents from states that only required voters to state their name.
    • African-American respondents in non-photo identification states are 0.012 percent less likely to report voting than African-American respon­dents from states that only required voters to state their name.
    • In general, respondents in photo identification and non-photo identification states are just as likely to report voting compared to respondents from states that only required voters to state their name.
    • African-American respondents in photo identi­fication states are just as likely to report voting compared to African-American respondents from states that only required voters to state their name.
    • Hispanic respondents in photo identification states are just as likely to report voting compared to Hispanic respondents from states that only required voters to state their name.

    Realizing they have zero evidence that photo ID laws disenfranchise voters, activists pivot and argue that Indiana’s law is under inclusive since it fails to require absentee voters to present photo IDs. Leaving aside the impossibility of this request, what is most galling about this argument is that these same activist groups are the ones that push for more absentee and mail in voting in their efforts to ‘expand the franchise.’ At least we now have them on record admitting that absentee voting is ripe for voter fraud.

    Posted in Legal [slideshow_deploy]

    2 Responses to Fraudulent Arguments On Voter Fraud

    1. Eduardo says:

      I do not see a problem with a voter's ID card that can be issued at a voter's registration facility where you show proper identification and proof of citizenship then get issued a voter's photo ID card. No person shall be able to vote unless he/she has a voter's ID card with a picture. Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens, and although they do not vote in the national election, they vote in local elections. Every voter has to apply for a voter's photo ID card with proper identification and proof of U.S. citizenship. I have not heard anyone complain as being bothersome or infringing in their rights or preventing someone from going to the polls.
      The states here should apply best practices methods that work and apply them here.
      No Voter Photo ID card, no vote. this should eliminate voter fraud (if any) to a very small amount.

    2. crs52 says:

      And is ALEC a "vast leftwing conspiracy" as well?

    Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

    Big Government Is NOT the Answer

    Your tax dollars are being spent on programs that we really don't need.

    I Agree I Disagree ×

    Get Heritage In Your Inbox — FREE!

    Heritage Foundation e-mails keep you updated on the ongoing policy battles in Washington and around the country.

    ×